An ultra-realistic, professional photograph showing a compassionate German midwife gently guiding a new mother's hands as she tenderly holds her newborn baby. The midwife, mother, and baby are centered in the frame, radiating warmth, connection, and professional care. Soft natural light illuminates the scene in a modern, light-filled German room. The background is softly blurred, subtly revealing characteristic German architecture outside a window, providing context without distracting from the central figures. The image conveys the vital, nurturing role of midwives in Germany.

Midwives Leaving: Government Inaction

1. Background: Midwife shortage and government stance (2026)

In 2026 the federal government acknowledged precise problems in midwifery care across Germany: a growing midwife shortage, gaps in maternity care and specific access problems for low‑income women. Despite this acknowledgement, critics from the Green Party say the government has not proposed concrete measures to stop the exodus of midwives from the profession.

Key figures and trends

Recent studies show nearly one in two midwives is considering leaving the profession. Many report economic pressure and increasing workload. Beleghebammen (community or freelance midwives who attend births) play a major role in birth assistance: they attend about 20 percent of births nationwide and up to 80 percent in some regions such as Bavaria. Financial stress and contract changes have already led to entire teams resigning.

2. The Hebammenhilfevertrag (midwife assistance contract) and its effects

The Hebammenhilfevertrag, which has not been adjusted since 2018 and was set by arbitration after long negotiations, determines how freelance midwives are compensated. Critics and the German Midwives Association (Deutscher Hebammenverband, DHV) say the contract’s payment rules drastically lower earnings for Beleghebammen and deepen supply problems in maternity care.

Contract specifics and the impact on remuneration

Under the current contract rules a Beleghebamme often receives 80 percent of the hourly base rate for the first woman and only 30 percent for the second or third woman under multiple‑birth coverage, despite retaining the same level of responsibility. The GKV‑Spitzenverband defends this by pointing to incentives for 1:1 care, but the DHV calls that justification an illusion because the promised additional payments rarely materialize for practising midwives.

SituationCompensation
Typical current payment for first woman80% of €74.28 per hour
Payment for second or third woman30% of €74.28 per hour
DHV demand100% of €74.28 per hour from the first woman; link to wage development
Reported practical lossUp to 35% income reduction for some Beleghebammen

Negotiation leader Ursula Jahn‑Zöhrens warned that the arbitration outcome and the resulting contract rules may mean the profession’s end for many colleagues. The DHV has called for immediate readjustment of compensation rules to prevent further exits.

3. Political response and criticism

Politicians and professional representatives have sharply criticized the lack of concrete government action. Green Party health spokespersons argue the government is ignoring the competence of midwives, the missing formal integration of midwives into the wider health system, and the failure to address mental health issues in and around pregnancy.

Mental health, screening and system integration

Greens stress that psychological illnesses around pregnancy are among the most frequent complications and have called for comprehensive, nationwide screening and better early detection. They say these measures should be combined with structural reforms that embed midwives more firmly into the health system so their work is recognised, supported and adequately paid.

4. Consequences for maternity care and families

The combined effect of low pay, an unfavorable contract and perceived government inaction risks a rapid deterioration of maternity care. The DHV warns of regionally noticeable care gaps and even a potential ‘birth assistance catastrophe’ if the contract is implemented as planned. Women with low incomes and families in regions that rely heavily on Beleghebammen are particularly affected.

Direct impacts to watch

  1. Loss of experienced midwives as many plan to leave the profession.
  2. Localized shortages in birth attendance—especially in areas where Beleghebammen cover a large share of births.
  3. Reduced continuity of care and increased pressure on hospital maternity wards.
  4. Greater access problems for low‑income pregnant women.

5. What needs to change: Practical recommendations

Stakeholders and the DHV propose a set of urgent measures to stabilise maternity care and retain midwives. These recommendations focus on fair remuneration, structural integration and targeted screening for perinatal mental health problems.

Actionable steps

  • Adjust the Hebammenhilfevertrag so Beleghebammen receive 100% of the hourly rate from the first woman (instead of 80%), and tie remuneration to wage development.
  • Ensure additional payments for 1:1 care are actually accessible in practice, not just theoretically available.
  • Integrate midwives more formally into the health system to recognise competencies and reduce administrative barriers.
  • Introduce nationwide screening for psychological illnesses around pregnancy and offer timely support.
  • Prioritise maternity care in political negotiations and coalition discussions to prevent further erosion of services.

6. Conclusion

The situation in German midwifery is urgent: a clear shortage, deep financial pressure on Beleghebammen and a contract framework that many professionals say accelerates exits. The DHV and political critics urge quick policy adjustments to avoid regional breakdowns in birth assistance and to protect maternal health. Without compensation reform, better integration and systematic screening for perinatal mental health, maternity care risks becoming less accessible and less safe for many families.

Table of Contents

Picture of editor

editor